On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Alexander Larsson said:
> On 25 Jan, Lars Clausen wrote:
>>
>> We talked about having some settings dialog pop up when the user
>> double-clicks a tool widget. For the creation widgets, shouldn't that
>> just be the properties dialog the object defines, but setting defaults
>> instead?
>
> Hmmm. Maybe. That might be overkill for some objects though. Like
> setting the text of a text object, or having the enormous uml class
> dialog for tool dialog.
The text dialog doesn't include the text itself, so that'll be ok. As for
the UML dialogs, I (if I were to use such things) would like to at least
set other default class options, and possibly have default attributes,
operations and templates, too. Doing it this way we can reuse the
properties dialog, which would be both easy and use very little code.
-Lars
--
Lars R. Clausen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
A *real* smart bomb would call in sick, perhaps move to another country,
changing its name in the process, open a beach bar maybe and live out its
days in safe anonymity. -- Barry O'Neill in rhod
