On 7 Jun 1999, Lars R.Clausen wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I was away for the weekend. A friend got married and i turned 25. > > Ah, congratulations. Thanks. > You mean: > > [] > | > | > | > | > +----[] > > It still does that -- the extra bend disappears. Ok. But this can be fixed. Now that we have object menus they can be used to delete (and maybe add) new points (like the polyline object). Then this behaviour can be changed. > > We can either handle this or forbid objects to have behaviour like this. > > I don't think any current object has such behaviour. > > Think again... interestingly, when you move it by connecting it to > something else and moving that, the extra bends don't disappear. Possibly > the addition/removal of the bends should be in undo, too. Urgh. > > It's not very easy to create a general dialog construction code powerfull > > enought to express the class properties dialog though... > > I see the problem... I thought about making the dialogs with macros. Not > that nice, but a possibility. Then the specialized dialogs can be done 'by > hand'. Yeah, that might me ok. I don't know about macros, but support code anyway. > >> BTW, this would be a per-diagram undo, right? > > > > Of course. All else suck. > > Well, property dialogs are global. Should they be that? (Not that it's > entirely related, I was just wondering.) I don't know. I think so, you get so many windows otherwise... / Alex
