On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 03:00:51PM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 11:00:59AM +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I do not know if I have misandurstand everything, but I think connection
> > points for all line objects is a nice feature. Especially on polyline which
> > does exactly (?) the same as an ordinary line. If that is not possible the
> > polyline should be replaces with a connection-point object, I think. Whis
> > might be way out of youre discussion but that is a feature I like anyway. It
> > would make things LOT easier.
>
> Eh? What does connection point have to do with this? "Connection" is a
> base class that can be used for creating objects that behave like a line
> connecting two points.
Then It was just like I thought... I did misandurstood... Ok...
> Connection points on polyline is indeed possible. It just hasn't been
> done.
ok.
> > I do not andurstand why all "green points" can act as connectionpoints. Is
> > there any time which this is not good... ??? At least for the "standard
> > objects"...
>
> "Green points" are handles. They can be connected to "connection points"
> (blue crosses). I don't understand the question.
Vi tar det p� svenska tror jag... Ser att min engelska �r riktigt usel...
Jag t�nkte mig att alla (gr�na) punkter kan fungera som kontaktpunkter (bl�
kryss) hos alla objekt. Eller i alla fall f�r alla standardobjekct (linjer,
rutor etc). Har man det beh�ver man inte en polyline-funktion, bland annat.
Men det var som sagt inte n�got som hade med det ni diskuterade att g�ra...
Missf�rstod lite...
// Mvh Ola
--
---------------------------------------------------------
// Ola Lundqvist \\
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bj�rnk�rrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINK�PING |
\ http://h81.ryd.student.liu.se +46 (0)13-17 69 83 /
\\ UIN/icq: 4912500 +46 (0)70-332 1551 //
---------------------------------------------------------
