On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 05:27:46PM -0500, Scot E. Wilcoxon wrote:
>> > This mailing-list is intentionally set up so that non-subscribers can
>> > post. This is done so we won't lose any bug reports etc.
>>
>> How about a separate dia-list-public or dia-list-report list which is
>> open, and those who want it can subscribe to both lists? Or a moderator
>> could copy over the non-spam...or have spam filters which block possible
>> spam until the moderator approves it.
>
> Is it really that hard for you to hit "d" for now? Setting up an
> alternate list is, first and foremost, going to confuse new users. I for
> one don't think this deserved because very low amounts of spam are coming
> through.
Seeing has how there has been 5 instances of spam over the last 500
messages, it's hardly even worth writing this post about it (which brings
the number of posts discussing the spam up to the number of spams:).
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause) | H�rdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I | Retainer of Sir Kegg
will defend to the death your right to say it." | of Westfield
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire | Chaos Berserker of Khorne
