Hi Cedar, 
 
As a brazilian, I think it is important for us this change for free software to 
save money. But on the other hand, what I see in the brazilian government 
policy is a lack of training and support for the workers, teachers od the 
public schools to make this transition and use free software in the their daily 
activities and become more technological fluent in that too. For example, I am 
aware that this lack of training for the teachers makes them decide to do not 
make activities in the computer lab with the students because the teacher is 
not fluent on Linux and does not know how to integrate the activities in the 
curriculum. I think it will change, but the great majority of the work places 
in Brazil still use the Windows plataform. So I think it is a complex issue for 
the education system. One of the problems that I think that the free software 
view of the brazilian government is that a bit technocentric, and it is paying 
more attention to get access to software or hardware an!
 d less
 attention for training people to use those free softwares. I also look this 
brazilian government view with certain cautious, because I dont that a software 
should be considered 
'better just because it cost no money". It should be considered better if this 
especific software atends the necessity of the user/or certain community 
(example: technology developed for people from poor comunities in developing 
countries and not just for office). What kind of people/community the software 
engineer had in mind when they developed a certain software should be 
considered when we are choose one, independently if it is a free software or 
payed one.  I think that countries like Brazil, should choose for options that 
are more sustainable for the country. 
 
The governamental policy to use free software is also a making a big change in 
the brazilian digital inclusion movement. The idea of opening a telecenter with 
the donations of used computers and free software is very attractive for the 
poor communities and a lot of experiences like that are emerging in Brazil.  
But some communities are having difficulties with issues of sustaintability of 
the digital inclusion project and also to make this transition to open source 
and it created other problems and chalenges to the brazilian digital inclusion 
movement. So things are not so simple as it seems in the begining and a lot of 
experiences are emerging and disapearing too, and this creates other challenges 
for the construction of a brazilian policy for the digital inclusion movement.
Obs: Sorry for my English....
 
Sincerely, 
Ana Maria Moraes. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://br.geocities.com/bibliotecamicromundos
 
 

Cedar Pruitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the World Social Forum, a protest gathering that runs concurrently with 
the World Economic Forum, the use of software in the developing world is 
under scrutiny. 

Activists urged Brazil to discontinue the use of proprietary software from 
Microsoft and replace it with free open source software developed 
cooperatively by groups of developers. "Already, Brazil spends more in 
licensing fees on proprietary software than it spends on hunger," said 
John Perry Barlow, co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, in a 
speech there Saturday. Reports the Boston Herald: "Brazil President Luiz 
Inacio Lula da Silva's administration says the open-source policy makes 
sense for a developing country where a mere 10 percent of the 182 million 
people have computers at home, and where the debt-laden government is the 
nation's biggest computer buyer." 


This morning, National Public Radio announced that Brazil was planning to 
switch all 300,000 government computers to rely exclusively on open-source 
software. 

NPR also announced that Microsoft founder Bill Gates has requested a 
meeting with da Silva to discuss the situation in more depth.

I'd be interested in hearing from others on this list on this topic. What 
direction will this action take? Could Brazil be the first step in an open 
source revolution among developing nations, and if so, is that a good 
thing? Are there any potential drawbacks to Brazil's action that we can 
think of?

It would be especially great to hear from people living and working in 
developing nations right now, and their immediate reaction to this news. 
Thinking ten years into the future, what will give the most advantage to 
the citizens of today's developing world?
-Cedar

For more information:

Distinguished copyright expert Lawrence Lessig blogged his reaction to the 
Forum: 

Slashdot takes notes: 



--------------------------------------------------------
Cedar Pruitt
Online Content Manager
EDC Center for Media & Community
http://cmc.edc.org
cpruitt @ edc.org
(617) 618-2185
---------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

__________________________________________________
Converse com seus amigos em tempo real com o Yahoo! Messenger 
http://br.download.yahoo.com/messenger/ 
_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to