Very interesting article.  Of course, the Bush administration made eliminating 
community technology funding a priority from day one of their first 
administration. The CTC program is gone after several years of minimal support. 
In fact, the Bushies are trying to eliminate or drastically reduce all 
community and adult education programs, and they have succeeded in many areas. 
The ones that weren't eliminated have been changed to school/youth programs, 
perhaps in response to criticism that No Child Left Behind wasn't funded from 
the get-go.

Some things that I don't think were mentioned (although I did just skim the 
article):
1. There is so much stuff out there in Spanish. Plus common software can be 
installed using the Spanish language version. I have most of my computers set 
up so one can choose English or Spanish, plus Spanish spell-checkers, Spanish 
hotmail and yahoo, etc. The reading possibilities are endless--dozens of Latin 
American newspapers and magazines, chat rooms, email, etc.
2. Adults often get excited by being able to email or IM with family in their 
home country in their native language. They will learn to use the computer just 
to do this. Since there are cybercafes all over the world, it is often the 
family member left at home in the native country who initiates the interaction 
and insists that the US resident learn to use the computer.  
It is kind of funny--in developing countries where cybercafes are the only way 
for most people to go online, lower income people have a much greater 
opportunity to use the internet and computer. It is here in the US where we 
rely on personally owned computers and connections that low income people don't 
have access. There are few cybercafes and the few that exist charge too much.
3. Since virtually all education funding is now directed at the public schools, 
and very few public schools can open their facilities to the community at 
nights and on weekends, access may shrink.
4.  When latinos and lower income people have computers, they (the computers) 
are generally old, lack software, are technically challenging, and lack key 
components like a modem. If they have internet access, it is dial-up. Either 
broadband is not available, or it is too expensive.
5. Some low income communities in our area suffered from higher ed 'drive by' 
programming. For example, one of our state universities (located hundreds of 
miles from the border) was awarded a grant to provide technology labs to the 
border colonias in Texas. Of course, there are over 400,000 residents in over 
2000 colonias stretched across the Texas-Mexico border. One grant wasn't going 
to make much of a dent. But after that, federal funders said that the colonias 
were funded, so there was no need for additional funding. Ha!

I have created four public access labs in the border colonias, so I speak from 
experience as much as anything else. Right now I run a very popular lab, and I 
am struggling with the usual issues: How do we get more teen girls and adult 
men interested? How do we get the schools to teach more than word processing?  
Why do boys download everything they find on the net and then complain that the 
computer is slow? Just because the users are 100% Latino soesn't mean that we 
do not face many of the same issues as anyone else!

BTW, on the DD list, I feel that we have more in common with the community 
technology centers in India and Africa than anywhere else.

Kathleen Muro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to