Why does this have to be an "either - or" problem? Those communities that
have the population of those that can afford the "personal," well, that's
probably what they will buy. For those without that luxury, then certainly
the "public" is the best option. A computer in a public space is better than
no computer at all.
Interesting idea, though, about "public" and "personal" computing. I like
the distinction and think it deserves a future investigation as to the
applications of both uses of technology. Does this open a realm of different
software for each application? Are there "public" and "personal" uses that
are completely outside each other's domain? Can a computer have a "public"
and a "personal" profile that will make available different facets of the
computer? Since logging on to your computer is inherent in most operating
systems, it wouldn't be too far a stretch to set up those distinct profiles
and keep them secure.
I think the "right road" is not universal and can only be determined based
upon the inner workings of the community deciding. Perhaps there's a needs
survey that should be developed to determine "personal" or "public"
computing, so that donating organizations have a better idea what to donate.
Wouldn't it be possible, though, to use the computer for both needs? While
in a public location, can't I use my computer personally? Does the
distinction really matter to a community without computer access?
-todd seal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-san jose, ca
-ddn blog: http://www.digitaldivide.net/blog/tsguitar
_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE
in the body of the message.
