"Yigal Chripun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You've posted in the NG your intention to re-implement several key modules in phobos including IO and algorithm, I'm hoping that instead of two separate IO systems (tango and phobos) you could use the Tango IO and implement your Range proposal on top of it. Others already suggested that on this NG.
There are good reasons for keeping the IO separate. Phobos is based on the C runtime, meaning you can interleave D IO with C IO and everything will behave nicely. Tango's IO layer is written from scratch, using OS calls. You shouldn't mix Tango IO with IO in a linked-in C library.
L.
