Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:40:28 -0700, Sean Kelly wrote: > Don wrote: > > > > We also now have two modules called 'bitmanip', which is somewhat ironic > > since we brainstormed for ages trying to come up with a better name for > > it. Modules with duplicate names have caused linking problems in the > > past -- not sure if that applies here. > > It applies if the modules from both Phobos and druntime end up in the > same library on *nix. Windows doesn't appear to have the same issue. > But I'd love to hear suggestions for alternative names-- I'm not > terribly good at naming modules :-p. > > Also, any I'd like to see how people feel about having three top-level > packages in druntime vs. one-- an alternative I'd considered was to put > everything under core.
I actually was expecting all the runtime stuff to be in core.* and was surprised to find std and sys there.
