On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What's the precedence of your user-defined in-fix operator? >>> >>> --bb >> >> Yup, I realized this myself as well. Seemed like such a great idea when I >> only thought of it for three seconds. :p > > An operator could always be defined to have the same precedent as an > existing operator, which it has to specify. Walter said in a previous post a few days ago when I suggested it that that would kill D's easy parsability. You say no? I'm no parser expert, so hard for me to say. --bb