On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:37:27 +0300, bearophile <[email protected]>
wrote:
Bill Baxter:
For me, V1.038 compiles my code but takes a really really really long
time to do so.
It now takes 1 min 20 secs for a full build, when it used to compile
in 13 seconds.
Forget the 60% slowdown from LDC -- this is 515% slower!
(building with DSSS and tango)
I have tested the compilation timings of my dlibs (using 'bud'), they
contain lot of templates.
Compilation timings (with unittest), no run:
V1.037: 11.33 s
V1.038: 11.52 s
The size of the resulting exe is the same (1.887 MB).
(Without unittests the compilation is much faster, about 0.47 seconds
for 1.038).
So it seems my compilation timings are grown, but not much.
I have just found out that 'bud' isn't using both cores of my CPU. Why??
Neither does DMD (bud is just a thin wrapper around DMD).
I use CodeBlocks and it has "number of parallel builds" option which is
very helpful.
DSSS on Linux can do that, too, IIRC.
Bye,
bearophile
