Bill Baxter Wrote: > Great to hear about the progress! > > As always, nothing speaks to people's hearts like screenshots. So put > some up if you get a chance! > > Also eagerly awaiting the report from you guys on what kind of > reflection capabilities D would need to support Qt perfectly without > MOC. > > --bb > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Eldar Insafutdinov > <e.insafutdi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2 month passed since the work on Qt binding started and we got first > > results now. There are about 130 classes that work now or I better say > > _should_ work now because it requires a lot of testing. Among them are > > basic widgets like QLabel, QPushButton and so on. The API is not full and > > there is methods that have container types or Variants as parameters. Basic > > layouts work. The whole thing works only on linux for the moment. > > > > For those who doesn't know we are at http://code.google.com/p/qtd/ > > > > The main issue is that signals and slots and therefore event-handling in > > toolkit is not implemented. So it means that it is not really useful right > > now. But still we decide that it will be better than announce that not, to > > let people know that some work is going on. > > > > Any help will be appreciated i.e. improving build system, porting tutorials > > and examples, or if you want help with the binding itself. > > > > Thank you, best regards. > > Eldar Insafutdinov > >
ok, I will make screenshots tomorrow. And yes we remember about reflection request, Katrina has been busy recently, she will take a look at it as soon as possible.
