Mike Parker Wrote: > Eldar Insafutdinov wrote: > > naryl Wrote: > > > >> Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote: > >>> I'm thinking on putting only C++ part of binding to a dll, while > >>> statically link D part. With Qt 4.5 out under lgpl we can make QtD under > >>> BSD, so this will work. > >> You mean the Revised BSD License I presume? > > > > It's a subject to discuss. I am not good at licenses. > > The revised (or modified) BSD is the version most commonly used today. > In my experience, when people say "BSD License" it's the one they are > usually referring to. This is the version of BSD used for Derelict. > > As for the difference, the original BSD included a clause that required > derived works to acknowledge the original work. The modified version has > no such requirement. You can read more about it on Wikipedia[1]. > > I've looked at numerous open source projects over the years which were > licensed under the BSD. I can't recall the last time I saw one using the > original version. IMO, using the modified version is a no-brainer. > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
Okey, if it is the most suitable license, we can go with it.
