Gregor Richards wrote:
My only request is that people (or at least Walter) don't describe it using the term "Open Source". It's confusing, it's wrong, and it dilutes a perfectly meaningful term. Use "source available", "source included", "non-redistributable source provided", I don't care, just not the term with loaded additional meaning.
You're right. I didn't call it open source in the changelog for that reason, and the reason this thread is titled the way it is is because of the thread title on reddit. But I still shouldn't have titled this thread that way.
