Charles Hixson wrote:
mixin(bitfields!("
uint x : 2,
int y : 3,
uint z : 2,
bool flag : 1,
")
so that it would be easier to shuffle the fields during development.
This has it's pluses and minuses, but by and large I think it's optional
presence would be a benefit.
That's a pretty neat idea. It's not difficult to implement, and it could
possibly placate a few naysayers. And it's not ambiguous with the
existing syntax either, so at least for a while both might be supported.
One improvement from the language could come from dropping the parens
requirement for mixin, in which case:
mixin bitfields!"
uint x : 2,
int y : 3,
uint z : 2,
bool flag : 1,
";
Andrei
