Daniel Keep wrote:
What about this syntax?check!("% == 3 || % == 5")(foo(5)); This could display: Expected: (% == 3 || % == 5) for <value of foo(5)>. Then you don't have to dick about writing classes when you want to test something. Rule one of a good API: get out of my way. :D -- Daniel
On the face of it, that seems reasonable. I'm not certain what I will do in that regard.
