On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:25:20 +0000, dsimcha wrote: > == Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article >> dsimcha wrote: >> > Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not >> > supposed to be implemented yet? >> The implementation of the synchronization of shared variables is not >> done yet. It's a big step to just make the default thread local, and to >> upgrade the static type system. > > Ok, certainly understandable. In that case, congratulations on the > release.
vote++ I like both the shared/tls stuff AND the big emphasis on bug-fixes.