On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote: > "BCS" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> Hello Nick, >> >>> what they can do is additionally provide a >>> non-youtube/flash version. Which should be really [censored] easy since >>> they had to have already had one in order to upload it to craptube in >>> the first place. >> > > Ha ha, you censored the "f^&*^&*"? :) > >> If they can, yes, but they might not have access to general file hosting >> or if they do, the bandwidth to steam video. >> > > 1. Sure, some people may not, but considering how cheap and easy good > hosting packages are these days, I find it hard to believe that, out of a > group of programmers, any more than a small minority wouldn't have > reasonable hosting. I mean look at me, I can't afford basic airfare to go to > a conference (or any of the repairs that my car currently needs), but I > still have a gig or so of hosted space and about 100x as much bandwidth as > I'm actually using.
Or, you know, maybe we could stop reading so much into Ary's _completely understandable decision_ to host a short video on _the largest video hosting site in the world_. Give me a break. You guys act like it's a fucking affront to your religion to have to use Flash or Youtube.
