"bearophile" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Robert Fraser: >> However, the DMDFE's organization relies on being able to declare class >> member functions separately from where they're defined, which is >> impossible in D (hint, hint, nudge, nudge). > > This current characteristics of D classes makes them a bit simpler to > read/understand/use. > Can you tell me (and/or show a small example) where you think such > separation may improve some D code? >
Yea, I haven't seen anything yet about lifting the one-to-one module-to-file mapping that would make breaking bud/rebuild-like tools worthwhile. But I'd be interested in hearing any arguments in favor of doing so.
