"Nick Sabalausky" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > "Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> BCS wrote: >>> Hello Walter, >>> >>>> #ponce wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think it's disabled in debug mode to keep the compilation time low. >>>>> >>>> That, and the optimizer tends to scramble the relationship between >>>> source and assembler, making source debugging next to impossible. >>>> >>> >>> How hard would it be to have the code generate run on the unoptimized >>> code and then do the optimizer backed test and only if no bugs jump out, >>> move the results into the object file? >>> >> >> It seems even easier to just compile with -0. > > It isn't. *Very* typical workflow: > [stuff] > > None of those are particularly good options, and I don't see any other > possibilities. >
...Plus it's just plain unintuitive.
