Jerry Quinn wrote:
My personal desire is to implement (and track) the 2.0 language since
I would like to see that feature set available through GCC. Second,
by the time a working front end becomes part of GCC, the 2.0 language
will likely be complete.
One question I have (of many) is whether a different name should be
used. If this is called GDC there will be some confusion with the
current GDC. What thoughts do you all have?
In general is there interest in this project, especially contributing
to it?
Obviously, I can't help you with a clean room reimplementation, but I do
wish you every success with the project. I can also help with
specification problems that will inevitably arise.
