On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:23:07 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > I want to focus more on the fact that you are declaring the data after > the slice as being no longer used.
kind of assumeUnique ... assumeNoArrayReference ?
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Robert Clipsham
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Robert Clipsham
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Philippe Sigaud
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release biozic
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Michal Minich
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Lutger
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release Michal Minich
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 rel... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 rel... David Gileadi
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 rel... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 rel... Don
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 rel... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: dmd 1.057 and 2.041 release bearophile
