On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:41:25 +1100, Daniel Keep wrote: > BCS wrote: >> ... >> >> Maybe we need a std.arithmetic.* for all the "a little more than just a >> number" types. > > Phobos with subpackages?! Blasphemy! That's what those filthy Tango > heathens do and everyone knows that's just morally WRONG. > > (Yes, I know about std.c.*.)
Then all of Java must be wrong too? The list of std modules is getting a bit too long. Maybe a tree structure would work. After all it is for a programming language. Another idea would be to make another root, like dlang. or lang. Having std. in front of nearly makes it a piece of superflous, redundent information. There are many roots more to choice from, and maybe it be nice to have the root module path be more informative? -- Michael Rynn
