Jesse Phillips wrote: > Lutger wrote: > >> >> You could try getting LDC with Tango into debian, there are no license >> problems with them. > > My goal isn't exactly to get anything into the official repo. This is my > first time really doing packaging and I'd like to figure out what is > best for D. The conflicts between v1, v2, Phobos, and Tango coupled > with the packages depending on one or another, or any combination... > makes packaging very unclear.
Yes and that's exactly why this is a fine project, though getting in an official repo will be extra valuable. I might attempt it for fedora when, if ever, I get to finish my current projects. Is there any userbase for D1 without Tango at the moment? I'd think there is only the combination D1 plus Tango with gdc/ldc/dmd, and D2 with dmd getting any use to speak of. dmd is not redistributable and ldc seems to be more actively developed, so that's why I suggested that combo.
