>> >> Thanks. I got a build working and have tested it out. It seems that >> you've made a substantial change to the default syntax highlighting, >> both in the terms you use and their settings. Now, most of them I can >> fix to how I want, but the normal 'selected' settings are substantially >> better and more complex than a simple foreground and background color. >> Also, I'd strongly recommend keeping the current code::block standard >> highlighting if you're planning to have your trunk merged into the >> mainline tree. > > And one more thing, it doesn't appear that the -g option when linking in > debug mode is working.
Thanks for your report! to 1.) I haven't changed any code for the lexer (It's anyway not code from codeblocks but rather from scintilla) I only have added more tags in the xml-file and have changed the colors. But this is only a draft. The most colors was taken from the examples on the DigitalMars Page, couse I think this is rather the official standard for D. I also don't understand, why we should take the same colors, as it is used in C++ ?? But feel free to send me your version (lexer_d.xml) or a description how you want it and I would have a look at it. I have also tried a version with 8 different keywordgroups (as it is in Poseidon) and different colors for normal-string, raw-string, and so on ... but for my taste this is too much, I like it simple. to2.) which OS/compiler?
