On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:23:38 +0200, Jordi Sayol i Salomó wrote: > With this sctructure, others packages can interact nicely with dmd now > (one package) and in the future, because them will spect the > "dmd.conf.manager" script on dmd package, and this do not change after > split dmd.
My few comments. I think dmd should be packaged as dmd-2. At least for a Debian repo I couldn't find any way to store two versions for the same package. Isn't Phobos more source than headers though, I mean the only "header" it has is object.di and I don't even know why. Is it important to have a compiler specific -dev? I realize compilers don't like getting along, but what happens when phobos becomes a shared library? I thought object files were suppose to be more "universal," doesn't libc6 work when using Digital Mars C++ compilers or does it have its own? Otherwise the tree looks fine.
