> > Actually, I don't see any functions which are faster than std.math. > std.math.exp2() is *much* faster than common.pow2() (one slow > instruction, vs five!!!) And exp2 sets the flags correctly. > expi() is faster than sincos(). >
I wrote that years ago because Pascal didn't have those ;) I refused to use std.math function because they were taking a real argument. is that optimized ? I've strong NIH syndrom. ;)
