Russel Winder, el 28 de enero a las 11:30 me escribiste: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 13:33 -0800, Bill Baxter wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote: > [ . . . ] > > > Yea, and that's pretty much the original thing I was saying: It's nice > > > that > > > Hg seems to have it, but Git doesn't appear to be particularly interested > > > in > > > it. > > > > I think it's very handy for all the reasons you said. I don't think > > I've every had to use a big hex string when dealing with mercurial. > > Maybe once or twice max. Most of the stuff you do with repo history > > as an individual developer is all about the local copy of the tree on > > your system. Globally unique identifiers aren't needed for that. It > > looks like Bzr does something similar. Not sure why Git hasn't gotten > > this particular nicety. > > Bazaar does indeed have revision numbers per branch. Note that branch > and repository is a different concept in Bazaar, unlike Git and > Mercurial where they are fundamentally the same.
WRONG about Git. AFAIK only in Darcs branch and repository is the same. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can try the best you can If you try the best you can The best you can is good enough
