From talking to our web programmers, each browser still has anomalies that must be worked around. IE is no exception.
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gibson <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 03.04.2011 00:22, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe: >> Nick Sabalausky: >>> Heh, yup. Because after all, VRML just went over sooo well. >> >> Yeah... "what's old is new again" fits so well to web 2.0. >> >> WebGL gets more minus points too since its on shaky technical >> grounds too. It isn't very 'webby' if you will and may have >> security implications... but wheee you can make shitty ports >> of old games to the browser! > > If it helps killing Flash I'm fine with WebGL, HTML5-videotag (I hope google's > WebM will win) etc. However that shouldn't be used in serious (non > demo/showcase) websites until proper support is ready in all major browsers. > > As a web developer you should be glad that IE5/6's days are over and browsers > are a more standard-conformant - or did you like writing a different version > of > your websites for each browser? > A friend of mine who does web programming complained about having to work > around > IE6's anomalies a lot until he could finally stop supporting it, so I'm kind > of > surprised that you and Nick seem to like these old versions of the IE. > > Cheers, > - Daniel
