"Jonathan M Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:mailman.2760.1315507814.14074.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com... > On Thursday, September 08, 2011 17:52:37 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> Ok cool, my DWin project successfully compiles. The WinAPI bindings >> are missing extern(Windows) specifiers for its function aliases and >> 2.055 seems to enforce this now, so that api will have to be updated. >> The only thing that's bothering me is the notices, there's just too >> many of them. >> >> For example this: >> >> import std.stdio; >> import std.path; >> >> void main() >> { >> writeln(curdir.rel2abs); >> } >> >> turns into this: >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.rel2abs has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use absolutePath instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.isabs has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use isAbsolute instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.getDrive has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use driveName instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.join has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use buildPath instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.rel2abs has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use absolutePath instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.isabs has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use isAbsolute instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.getDrive has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use driveName instead. >> Notice: As of Phobos 2.055, std.path.join has been scheduled for >> deprecation in February 2012. Please use buildPath instead. >> >> That is just unacceptable imho. > > At present, the only way to get rid of them is to fix your code so that it > doesn't use the functions which are scheduled for deprecation. > Improvements to > the deprecated keyword have been in discussion to improve the situation. > e.g. > > https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/345 > > It should only be reporting once per function though, so generally it > shouldn't be this bad. It's likely happening because a bunch of std.path > functions call each other, and they're all templated. >
Using RDMD can also inflate the number of notices, since it calls DMD twice. ------------------------------- Not sent from an iPhone.
