I think that having tango for D2 could be useful, but I would be quite disappointed if Tango would still not get along with phobos. I understand that druntime might be quite connected to phobos releases, still there should be less reasons this time to fork also the runtime this time. That was always a pita IMHO, and I am a happy D1/tango user.
Fawzi On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > On 10/19/11, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote: >> "zsxxsz" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> I love Tango, because it's like using JAVA to program with Tango, and using >>> >>> C++ >>> to program with Phobos. Java is much more easy to program. >> >> Heh. The Java-ness of it is actually the one thing about Tango that I don't >> really like. 'Course, I'm a big Java-hater anyway, YMMV... >> > > Oh what, you don't like > getterAbstractFactoriesBuilderFactorySingletonObjectListener?
