On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:50:09 +0000, zsxxsz wrote: > > I don't like Phobos design, which takes all libs in the same path > looking so urgly, but tango seperate libs in different path according to > its function using, > so I like tango's design.
You will never satisfy both worlds (simplicity vs flexibility). Both Phobos and Tango have their place in the D community. It is unfortunate many people in the D community fails to see it. Also, it is unfortunate (but very easy to explain) that Tango project started as a complete implementation of the run-time library. We debate this for years on irc:// irc.freenode.org/d and it never ends. I belong to the group that like the way Phobos does things, but unlike some people I think Tango is a brilliant, high-level library. I wish we had druntime when Tango project started, but nothing is lost, I believe Tango2 project will fit nicely on top of druntime, and live long and prosperous life. The reason why I also like Tango (even though I never used it in anything serious) is that it reminds me a lot of Java API which is robust, reach and intuitive. Tango IO is very similar to Java NIO...
