On 02/16/2012 08:05 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2012 15:27:26 F i L wrote:
Marco Leise wrote:
I'm just repeating what's already been said, but UFCS on
classes and structs has the problem of ambiguities with proper
methods of those. If 2.058 introduced more UFCS, then it is for
literals. Try "123.foo;".
C#'s had "UFSC" for years without ambiguity problems. Also,
"123.foo;" doesn't work.
C# doesn't have free functions. So, how could it have UFCS?
- Jonathan M Davis
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb383977.aspx
