On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Adam D. Ruppe <[email protected]>wrote: > > Some integer semantics might be hard too. ubyte is ok, but byte > is different because 127+1 isn't as simple as x & 0xff > > I'll have to think about that. Again, it surely *can* > be done, but I'd rather than an error than it generating > horribly inefficient javascript for simple operations. >
Might TypedArrays help you implement some number type semantics? http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/ --bb
