On 2012-03-05 10:49, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:25:28 +0100
Jacob Carlborg<[email protected]> wrote:
* Specifically targeted for D
That's a good one.
* Handles Objective-C
No interest for it atm.
* No need for interface files
This is also nice, but I wonder if one can tailor D side of the binding
or dstep is meant to just provide wrapper for C function?
Currently it's only meant to just provide bindings.
In the latter case, glueing dstsep with CWrape would be nice.
* Uses a complete front-end to do the parsing
* Static linking
Those are very nice as well...I might try dstep, so you can expect some
issues @github. ;)
Unfortunately it's not in a state where it's ready to be tested yet.
Sure you can always test it but there's no point in reporting issues for
something I know isn't finished or working. But help developing the tool
is always welcome.
Pros for SWIG
* Handles C++
We anticipate that our C++ usage in D is limited just to GUI libs and
hopefully there will be new wxD soon.
* In a more complete sate
That's true atm, but I'm not sure how much is klickverbot committed to
work on it...so, having specific binding tool for D is very nice in any
case.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
/Jacob Carlborg
