On 01/04/2012 18:27, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
<snip>
I gave this a brief look, the console stuff for windows caught my eye.
No offense, but I totally expected console module to do coloring or some other 
cool
terminal stuff. As is it looks like a workaround for stdio.

I'm not sure what it would take to do stuff like that. SUL isn't a Windows programming library - it's a utility library that aims to be as platform-independent as possible. Though some bits still need implementing or testing under platforms other than Win32 platforms (anyone want to help?).

The console module was created to get around three problems with stdio:

- no codepage support
- EOF assumed to be false unless known otherwise
- line of output is lost when EOF of stdin is reached (bug in Win9x, though 
fixed in Win2000+)

Still, I wonder how adding the "cool terminal stuff" of which you speak would go down. One worry is whether it'll detract from the primary purpose of the module....

BTW I think dgwrap can be safely yanked out, see
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_functional.html#toDelegate

Yes, I've discovered that. And I've noticed it's more general than dgwrap. I guess I'll have to experiment with it.

But I still wonder if there's a way that it could be made to work with variadics and whatever else. (Speaking of which, does anyone still use C-style or D-style runtime variadics, or have variadic templates taken over?)

Stewart.

Reply via email to