On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Sönke Ludwig <slud...@outerproduct.org> wrote: > > We still have a more comprehensive benchmark on the table but it seemed to > get along happily with about 60MB of RAM usage during a C10k test. The > average request time went down to about 6s if I remember correctly. The test > was using a dual-core Atom server over a WiFI connection so the results may > have been skewed a litte.
6s? Not 6ms? Why so slow?
