On Friday, 27 April 2012 at 20:15:05 UTC, Tove wrote:
On Friday, 27 April 2012 at 19:40:53 UTC, F i L wrote:
"vibe.d" as the project name is great, but why have module
vibe.d and not simply vibe? Or, why prefix all the types with
More complicated projects/frameworks ontop of vibe which
implements it's own main is free to use vibe.all.
But I think...
import vibe.d;
... makes perfect sense because it contains main()!
Ah I see, I was thinking the example wasn't the full code. Still,
I think doing something like:
import vibe, vibe.html;
where vibe has main() and vibe.html has html is still better
semantics.
