? my guess is that the spec is TDPL + TDPL errata. dlang.org should be updated as people notice inaccuracies. This project would be an ideal time to update dlang.org as people notice its not in sync with TDPL. If TDPL doesn't cover it then the community should review it.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote: > On 2012-05-11 14:14, Roman D. Boiko wrote: > >> On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 11:47:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote: >> >>> From the beginning, I'm think AST macro using CTFE. >>> >> Could you please elaborate? >> >> I plan to strictly follow published D specification. >> > > That won't be easy, nobody know what the specification is . TDPL, DMD or > dlang.org? > > > Exceptions from this rule are possible provided either of the following >> is true: >> * new functionality has been implemented in DMD but is not included into >> specification yet >> * specification is incorrect (has a bug) or incomplete, especially if >> DMD behavior differs from specification >> * change is compatible with specification and brings some significant >> improvement (e.g., this seems to be the case for my decision to >> introduce post-processor after lexer) >> >> Some more exceptions might be added later, but the goal is to minimize >> differences. >> >> >> > > -- > /Jacob Carlborg >
