On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 07:32:19 -0700, Leandro Lucarella <[email protected]>
wrote:
Adam Wilson, el 16 de July a las 10:56 me escribiste:
>So if I were to represent a theoretical merge sequence in ascii:
>
> ... former releases ...
> DMD Development GDC Development
> >---- DMD 2.060 release ---->
> | |
> DMD Development DMD 2.060.1 release
> v v
> | |
> | DMD 2.060.2 release
> | v
> | |
> | DMD 2.060.3 release
> | v
> | |
> DMD 2.061 beta DMD 2.060.4 release
> v v
> | |
> DMD 2.061 RC DMD 2.060.5 release
> v v
> | |
> >-- DMD 2.061 release ------>
>
>
>Would this be a correct way of utilising this new process?
>
I'd say mostly correct. The last step is the one where we might
Mmm, this makes me wonder if the stable releases based on a particular
official release will live only until the next official release is out,
or if they will be long-term. I thought it was the later, so people
don't have to worry about bugs related to new features they don't care
about, but now I'm not so sure.
Actually, I specifically mention that new features will left out until
stability is achieved. But at some point we will fold in the new features
from HEAD, our goal is to specifically AVOID creating a D1/D2 style split.
--
Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ACCIDENTE FATAL EN FLORES, MUEREN DOS PERSONAS Y UN BOLIVIANO
-- Crónica TV
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
