On 2012-07-30 10:31, Don Clugston wrote:
I guess the easiest way to do this would be to have a single, permanent branch called 'release', that is used for all releases, rather than creating a release branch for each compiler version.
Yes, exactly. The only reason for keeping the branches would be if we wanted to apply bug fixes and release a new version only based on that, i.e. 2.059-patch132 or something like that. But since we don't do that there's no reason. We also have tags for finding a release.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
