On 11/6/2012 12:47 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I always figured that it was pretty much a given that we'd get it at some point but that we'd wait until things were more stable before adding it. But if it was quick and easy to do now, all the better.
Anything I can do to make sure that going back to C++ is too terrible to contemplate <g>.
There's also I don't anticipate this being destabilizing. It doesn't affect the rest of the language at all. It doesn't break any existing code, or change any existing rules.
