Le 07/11/2012 13:01, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-11-07 12:05, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
OK, that's another thing. And maybe a reason for listening to people
having
more experience with UDAs than you.
For me the analogy with Exceptions is pretty good. The issues an
conveniences
of throwing anything or annotating a symbol with anything instead of just
type are pretty much the same. I only see functions making sense to be
accepted
as annotations too (that's what Python do with annotations,
@annotation symbol
is the same as symbol = annotation(symbol), but is quite a different
language).
I start to more and more think it would be better to explicitly require
the developer to declare an attribute, like:
attribute foo
{
string name;
}
@foo("asd") int a;
Yes that was pretty close to what my proposal looked like in the big
annotation thread, except I used @ttribute .
