On 2012-11-21 19:11, Namespace wrote:
Nothing, if enough people say that they need him I will implement them again. But maybe better. :)
Cool :)
const in D1 isn't the const as in D2 and enforce only that the object cannot be assigned again? Strange. O.o
Yes, it worked a bit more like "const" in C than in C++. I just came to think of this since you mentioned "lazy const".
But then I will think about it. Schould not be much work.
Thanks. -- /Jacob Carlborg
