renoX, el 27 de December a las 10:16 me escribiste: > On Monday, 24 December 2012 at 00:34:29 UTC, Kelly wrote: > >On Saturday, 22 December 2012 at 21:02:21 UTC, Faux Amis wrote: > >>On 21/12/2012 19:02, Lars Ivar Igesund wrote: > >>>Dear D community, > >>> > >>>I've been urged by many others to post about Amber here. It is > >>>a > >>>programming language being derived from D1, with a compiler > >>>written > >>>using D1 and Tango, with LLVM and C backends. The quality of > >>>code and > >>>documention is alpha (or pre-alpha). > >>> > >> > >>I would love to read a bit about the differences between D1 and > >>Amber. > > > > > >Might be incomplete, but here is the start of a list: > > > >https://bitbucket.org/larsivi/amber/wiki/Diff_D1 > > I do not want to sound dismissive, but IMHO the list of differences > is a bit "small" to start a new language..
The real difference is against D2, since D1 is considered a dead language officially now. I think Amber tries to be another evolution of D1, a little less radical than D2. Maybe you could see D1 as C and D2/Amber as C++/Objective C (I don't want to suggest any specific mapping between them :P). -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Spooker3 always wanted to learn russian...but learned C++ instead :)
