Pierre Rouleau, el 4 de January a las 11:59 me escribiste: > On 13-01-04 3:45 AM, Walter Bright wrote: > >On 1/4/2013 12:16 AM, eles wrote: > >>Two concrete examples: > >> > >>http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5992 > >> > >>is described in the list as: " Phobos Win64 - D2 "; At least, change > >>its title > >>to something more human, like "Win64 alpha has been released with working > >>Phobos." (yes, that's exactly Don's comment, but at the end of the > >>discussion). > >> > >>http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 > >> > >>is described as: "version(assert)". Only if you read the discussion you > >>understand that "version(unittest) that allows setup code for assertions > >>to run when assertions are enabled and be compiled out when assertions > >>are > >>disabled" was implemented. > >> > >>It is very different thing to see "version(assert)" and reading a > >>meaningful > >>description of it... > > > >I understand and agree. And, as I posted previously, anyone can fix the > >issue titles. I've already fixed a few. > Don't you think a process that requires reviewing these titles > *before* the actual software release announcement posting would > help?
Yeah, that's another issue too. Having mutating "release notes" is awful and a PR disaster. Users only see the changelog once, assuming is immutable, because one thinks that releases are immutable and complete (those are very fundamental properties of a release, otherwise is a preview or a snapshot). That's another thing that I think is important to address eventually. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- All evidence has been buried All tapes have been erased But your footsteps give you away So you're backtracking
