On 01/06/2013 10:18 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
On 13-01-06 9:45 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, January 06, 2013 21:22:18 Pierre Rouleau wrote:
Is this something that the most influential people in the D project want
to fix?
What exactly do you want fixed?
Really, I would like to be able to start using D at work. And be in a
position to be able to convince people to use it.
I found myself in the same position. My argument was:
1. There is a clear language reference
2. There are multiple implementations (DMD, GDC)
3. D has a lot of really nice features that make it better than C
Now, you have to bear in mind, we don't do bytecode compiled languages
that run on a VM - it's just not our thing, we use too much real
hardware. Basically, D gives us all the fancy nice Java and C# features
while letting us access real hardware without having to write a C shim
to do it.
We do not require a fancy cohesive roadmap, because we realize it's a
FLOSS project and is therefore subject to the whims of its developers.
If we want to influence said development, then we'll jump in or issue a
bounty for things to be fixed.
In the grand scheme of things, we've found this strategy to produce more
time savings and value than it consumes. However, this does take a
certain amount of buy in from your company management. Luckily, one of
the company founders was an early embracer of Linux.
--
Matthew Caron, Software Build Engineer
Sixnet, a Red Lion business | www.sixnet.com
+1 (518) 877-5173 x138 office
