On Monday, 28 January 2013 at 17:36:58 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Fixing private is enough.
Not a fan of the static thing at all. It is a great thing that
the static attribute actually has a consistent meaning in D.
mixin template X(){
static int x = 2;
}
class C{
mixin X; // x is a public TLS variable
}
mixin X; // x is a public TLS variable.
No need to screw this up.
Good, that was exactly example I could not crystallize. I wanted
to avoid introduction of new keyword, thus reused static. May be
there is no such way around.
Anyway, I intentionally kept static and private parts decoupled
so either of them can be approved alone.
