On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:19 +0000 Dejan Lekic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:15:09 +0100 > > "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Best code, it's which works and the client is satisfied. > > > > And the end users are satisfied. AND doesn't cause problems when it > > inevitably needs maintenance. And isn't prone to crapping out or > > breaches of security. > > AND you expect that from ONE, single person who is implementing > something like Higgs? :) Come on, be realistic... > Just to be clear, I was replying to the comment about what qualifies as "best" code. I never said anything about *expecting* anything.
