On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 11 de May a las 20:22 me escribiste:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that they should all be
released as soon as is technically feasable.
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
As far as I'm concerned, I'd prefer if all videos are released as soon
as possible. AFAIK no other conference that publishes videos introduces
an artificial delay when releasing videos and slides, just for "PR"
reasons.
With all due respect I'd dare ask how versed you are in organizing
conferences, PR campaigns, or anything related. Releasing video
recordings with a delay has been the policy of all recent conferences
I've participated or organized.
I even think is anti-PR to do such a thing (I can see how
making one announcement each couple of days in reddit/etc. can help keep
D in the spot but I don't see any reason why not to upload the actual
stuff and link it in the conference website).
There is evidence indicating we are doing the right thing. On what basis
do you believe it's negative for PR?
People that is actively looking for the stuff should be able to find it.
People that doesn't know about the conference, should get a notification
about a new video once in a while.
People who are actively looking for the stuff will sure find it forever
- just with a little delay at start, which I have explained why I find
entirely reasonable.
Still, 10 months seems crazy. As
somebody mentioned before, 1 month seems much more reasonable, 2 at most.
With three a week we'll be done in five more weeks. Please explain why
you find that unreasonable.
Andrei
